20-Somethings in Hoodies: Debunking Stereotypes of Entrepreneurs


If you were asked to picture a startup founder, what would they look like? If you said a 20-something guy in a hoodie, you wouldn’t be alone. Television shows like Silicon Valley and movies like The Social Network have burned a particular image into our collective mind. But the reality is different than the stereotype.

Stereotypes are endemic to mainstream culture, but their negative effects are well-documented. The most detrimental side effect of stereotypes comes from their power to reinforce themselves. In the case of the stereotypical startup founder being a 20-something in the hoodie, this can discourage those who don’t meet the stereotypical image to shy away from the role. Furthermore, the knowledge of stereotypes can subconsciously cause certain people to perform worse at a task that they’d otherwise excel at. Even seemingly positive stereotypes can have a negative impact if one doesn’t live up to the imaginary standard set for their peer group. False expectations, depersonalization, and emotional stress can result.

If stereotypes can hold people back, then the truth can set them free. And the truth about startups is that the most successful ones aren’t run by 20-somethings in hoodies. This is a field where success isn’t necessarily decided by age, gender, or even an ironclad business plan. Read on to get the data-driven lowdown on startup stereotypes.

Stereotype: You Have to Be Young

One of the most pervasive stereotypes about the startup world is that it’s the domain of the young. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and Mark Zuckerberg brought us the image of a young and isolated genius working from their laptop.

This stereotype has perniciously reinforced itself, with Peter Theil, co-founder of PayPal, starting a fellowship program specifically targeted for entrepreneurs aged 23 and younger who have dropped out of school. Vinod Khosla, cofounder of Sun Microsystems and a prominent venture capitalist, has stated he thinks that people under 35 are the ones who make change happen, while people over 45 “basically die in terms of new ideas.”

Like most stereotypes, it sounds correct on the surface. The younger someone is, the less distracted they are by non-work responsibilities like family. A young mind is sharp and according to Planck’s Principle, is less trapped by the existing paradigms of the world’s institutions. These things should mean that the young are more likely than the old to succeed in the world of startups. It all sounds correct, but it isn’t.

According to a 2018 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), successful startup founders are much more likely to be middle-aged than young. By looking at census data, the study was able to pinpoint the mean age of a founder of a successful (i.e., one out of 1,000) startup was 45 years old. So what’s really going on here?

The truth is that youth comes with more disadvantages than advantages in the world of startups. Younger entrepreneurs may have out-of-the-box ideas, but they have much less experience in running a business and managing the myriad departments (operations, marketing, sales, finance, HR, regulations, and strategy) that go with it. Good ideas in high-tech areas require deep, fundamental knowledge of evolving subjects that one can’t simply intuit. On the other hand, older entrepreneurs have greater access to different types of capital: financial capital, human capital, and social capital.

But the stereotype is continuing to perpetuate itself. In a study that looked at TechCrunch award winners, the entrepreneurs listed as ones to watch in major magazines and startups backed by top venture firms had relatively younger founders. In fact, the average age of award winners was 29; the average age of those on media lists was 31; and the average age of venture-backed startups was in the mid-thirties. The reason for this is simple: these lists and awards are highly subjective.

The census data paints a clearer picture. Going off of a large sample, a 50-year-old startup founder is almost two times more likely to achieve upper-tail growth than a 30-year-old founder. Founders in their early twenties have the least likelihood of successfully exiting or creating a firm that registers as one out of 1,000 in terms of growth.

The stereotype tells us that experience isn’t nearly as important as youthful ideas. But the NBER study tells us the opposite. By including employment histories in their research, the conductors of the NBER study found that prior experience in the same field as one’s startup raises success rates up to 125 percent. This experience doesn’t even have to be in the same specific industry to show a benefit: the closer one’s prior experience is to the field of the startup, the greater the success rate.

Startups are a risky business: up to 90 percent of them fail. At the same time, venture firms are ready to spend $120 billion in 2019. Who is that money going to, and why? Especially in the startup world, investors would be wise to look at the data before making a decision.

Stereotype: You Need a Business Plan

When the truth is that older, more experienced founders are more likely to have success, it may seem counterintuitive that having a solid business plan is not a necessary ingredient. It turns out that business plans are precisely that: plans. And plans don’t necessarily correspond to reality.

In a study by Harvard Business Review of hundreds of successful entrepreneurs (i.e. those who exited through an IPO or a sale to another firm), close to 70 percent of those surveyed did not start with a business plan. An earlier study in the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance confirms the sentiment: an analysis of over 100 new businesses found no correlation between starting with a solid business plan and finding success.

Anthony Tjan, bestselling author and CEO of venture capital firm Cue Ball, found through his research that adaptability, team composition, and individual vision were all more important than an ironclad business plan. Most important, however, is a well-defined market segment or niche, as the number one reason startups fail is that they produce products that nobody wants.

Stereotype: You Have to Be Male

Yes, startups are still a male-dominated field: women hold less than 30 percent of the tech jobs at the world’s most successful startups. But perpetuating the idea that it should be male-dominated is extremely detrimental. This stereotype can create a vicious circle where it’s forgotten that a woman invented the concept of software—but it’s glorified that a guy in a hoodie created a digital yearbook.

Only 2.2 percent of the $130 billion raised for startups in 2018 went to teams with female founders. Meanwhile, 76 percent of total VC funds went to teams that were entirely male. Women received $2.88 billion across 482 teams, a notable increase from 2017’s $1.9 billion in a dollar perspective but still stalled at 2.2 percent of the total pie.

The reality, however, is changing faster than the money is changing hands. Women are founding startups more than ever before. According to nonprofit Women Who Tech, there’s been a 68 percent increase in women launching businesses in the US over the last 20 years, a rate of growth that’s twice that of businesses owned by men. Concurrently, the likelihood of startups with women executives to receive venture capital funding has tripled over a similar timeframe. If women business owners in America formed their own country, they’d have a GDP that ranked fifth highest on the planet.

The truth is that women-led startups are an attractive investment. When venture-backed, they have a 35 percent higher ROI than their male-run counterparts, and generate 12 percent higher revenue. Women entrepreneurs create 20 percent more revenue with 50 percent less money invested. There are over 10 million US businesses owned by women, the highest rate of female founders of any developed country. These numbers are doubly impressive when considering the numerous hurdles women face in startup sphere. But, with time and savvy investment, those hurdles will be reduced.

Matt Zbrog
Matt Zbrog

Matt Zbrog is a writer and freelancer who has been living abroad since 2016. His nonfiction has been published by Euromaidan Press, Cirrus Gallery, and Our Thursday. Both his writing and his experience abroad are shaped by seeking out alternative lifestyles and counterculture movements, especially in developing nations. You can follow his travels through Eastern Europe and Central Asia on Instagram at @weirdviewmirror. He’s recently finished his second novel, and is in no hurry to publish it.

Related Posts

  • 21 April 2020

    How Twitter and Square CEO Jack Dorsey is Challenging Conventional Business Practices

    What MBA program would teach that it’s OK for a CEO to run not one, but two billion-dollar companies headquartered in the United States on a part-time basis—and do it all while living in Africa?

  • 17 April 2020

    2020 MBA Graduate Gift Guide

    MBA gifts convey pride in a loved one's accomplishments and can help them achieve success and adjust to the next chapter in their lives. With that in mind, there are several kinds of gifts MBA grads appreciate most.

  • 2 April 2020

    Amazon Prefers Memos to Presentations: Should MBA Programs Require Writing Courses?

    MBA applicants and students who don’t think writing skills are essential to their career success might want to re-evaluate that opinion. Incredibly, the business that hires more MBAs each year than any other employer around the world—about double the number hired by runner-up McKinsey & Company—forbids presentations.

  • 25 March 2020

    Stung by Shootings, Will Airbnb’s IPO Implode Like WeWork?

    Online platforms can shield their operations under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, meaning that these companies can escape tremendous dimensions of legal accountability, responsibility—and costs.

  • 23 March 2020

    Carlos Ghosn: The Risks of “CEO Disease” & International Assignments for MBAs

    This cautionary tale should serve as a warning to every MBA student around the world not only about the risks of accepting assignments abroad in nations like Japan, but also about the consequences of a mysterious affliction they may face known as “CEO disease.”

  • 19 March 2020

    Can Artificial Intelligence Eliminate Top Jobs for Finance MBAs?

    The tech revolution that eliminated many popular jobs in industries like media and publishing hasn’t yet impacted Wall Street. But because of the threat of artificial intelligence (AI), that situation is about to change.

  • 20 February 2020

    Restructuring PG&E to Encourage Managerial Responsibility

    What is the crucial aspect of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company story that few are talking about? It isn’t about the crisis resulting from California’s massive wildfires or widespread power shutoffs. Instead, it’s a more fundamental issue: the impact that the ownership of a public utility exerts on the ethical conduct and responsibility of its managers.